Matthieu Herrb 48b8c076a7 add libc as a choice for SHA1 implementation
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:54:13PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthieu Herrb's message of Sun Nov 01 09:34:35 -0800 2009:
>
> > +AC_CHECK_FUNCS([SHA1Init], [HAVE_LIBC_SHA1=yes])
>
> I'd suggest AC_CHECK_FUNC instead; as far as I can tell, AC_CHECK_FUNCS
> will also define HAVE_SHA1INIT. Also, can you  use HAVE_LIBC_SHA1
> consistently rather than having two separate names (HAVE_LIBC_SHA1 and
> HAVE_SHA1_IN_LIBC)? Yes, I know one is a preprocessor symbol and the
> other is a cpp shell variable, but I think that will work anyway.
>
New version taking you comments into account.

From: Matthieu Herrb <matthieu.herrb@laas.fr>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:19:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add a probe for SHA1 functions in libc in *BSD.

The interface is the same as the one in libmd.

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
2009-11-02 07:37:30 -08:00
2009-07-17 14:57:50 -04:00
2009-10-23 09:46:30 +09:00
2009-07-07 17:36:24 -07:00
2009-10-20 13:32:47 +10:00
2009-10-20 13:32:47 +10:00
Description
Truly free fork of the XOrg project.
75 MiB
Languages
C 96.4%
Roff 1.1%
Objective-C 1%
Meson 0.9%
Shell 0.2%
Other 0.2%